<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/1.8.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Unity Migration Blog</title>
						<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php</link>
				<description>Updates, thoughts, and suggestions regarding the migration away from Novell</description>
				<language>en-US</language>
				<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
				<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=1.8.5"/>
				<ttl>60</ttl>
								<item>
					<title>nds22acn restarted</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=nds22acn_restarted&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Change Management</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">601@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>FYI,

I've migrated the volumes off of 22acn to clear a stuck Thunderbird lock file.  I'm also rebooting it to clear some old connections that can't be manually cleared.  I'll re-balance tonight.

</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI,</p>

<p>I've migrated the volumes off of 22acn to clear a stuck Thunderbird lock file.  I'm also rebooting it to clear some old connections that can't be manually cleared.  I'll re-balance tonight.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=601&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>nds22acn restarted</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=nds22acn_restarted_1&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Change Management</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">602@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>FYI,

I've migrated the volumes off of 22acn to clear a stuck Thunderbird lock file.  I'm also rebooting it to clear some old connections that can't be manually cleared.  I'll re-balance tonight.

</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI,</p>

<p>I've migrated the volumes off of 22acn to clear a stuck Thunderbird lock file.  I'm also rebooting it to clear some old connections that can't be manually cleared.  I'll re-balance tonight.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=602&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Symantec Av and Veritas NetBackup temp files</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=symantec_av_and_veritas_netbackup_temp_f&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="alt">Servers</category>
<category domain="main">Change Management</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">596@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>Over the past two weeks I've noticed that when UNI04NT has had performance issues or Apache issues, I would find at the root of each partition on the server large files with the name format of _vxfivspcacheFile*.* These result from Veritas Netbackup not removing the temporary files after a backup is complete.  The normally 2 gigs of free space is reduced to megabytes on the System partition.  Symantec Antivirus can hinder the timely release of the file, if is not configured to exclude the specific files.  Once held open by Symantec AV, I've only been able to clear the files by rebooting the servers.

I've reconfigured the exclusions of Symantec AV on UNI04NT and Scripts00 to hopefully not touch those files.   I'll check on the other servers.  Any SMS attached drives need to be included in the exclusion.</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past two weeks I've noticed that when UNI04NT has had performance issues or Apache issues, I would find at the root of each partition on the server large files with the name format of _vxfivspcacheFile*.* These result from Veritas Netbackup not removing the temporary files after a backup is complete.  The normally 2 gigs of free space is reduced to megabytes on the System partition.  Symantec Antivirus can hinder the timely release of the file, if is not configured to exclude the specific files.  Once held open by Symantec AV, I've only been able to clear the files by rebooting the servers.</p>

<p>I've reconfigured the exclusions of Symantec AV on UNI04NT and Scripts00 to hopefully not touch those files.   I'll check on the other servers.  Any SMS attached drives need to be included in the exclusion.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=596&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>File Server Resource Manager Can Cause Sluggishness</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=file_server_resource_manager_can_cause_s&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Filesystems</category>
<category domain="alt">FS03</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">586@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>The sluggishness experienced while deleting a large number of profile and home directory folders on FS03 was due to the File Server Resource Manager.  This is the service that maintains and keeps track of the quotas.

We are using the automatic quota feature so it knows when a directory is created or deleted under a directory it is set to manage.  The service writes to files in "P:\System Volume Information\SRM" whenever a quota is set or unset.

Stopping the File Server Resource Manager service while performing bulk deletes caused the sluggish performance to improve substantially.</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sluggishness experienced while deleting a large number of profile and home directory folders on FS03 was due to the File Server Resource Manager.  This is the service that maintains and keeps track of the quotas.</p>

<p>We are using the automatic quota feature so it knows when a directory is created or deleted under a directory it is set to manage.  The service writes to files in "P:\System Volume Information\SRM" whenever a quota is set or unset.</p>

<p>Stopping the File Server Resource Manager service while performing bulk deletes caused the sluggish performance to improve substantially.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=586&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Random AD Passwords Reset</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=ad_passwords_reset&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">User Accounts</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">584@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>We recreated all of the Unity AD accounts on 5/17/2006.  The accounts were given random passwords when they were created.  The accounts created on this date which have not used the reset password web page have had their passwords reset to the default Unity password combination this morning.

Any user who has used the password reset web page after 5/17/2006 has a synchronized AD password.

Any user account generated after 5/17/2006 has a synchronized AD password becuase the default Unity password combination is used when the accounts are generated.

This means that all Unity AD passwords should be known to the user.  The password will either be determined by the user via the password reset web page or will be the default Unity combination.

Here are some statistics:

By looking at the pwdLastSet attribute on AD user entries, you can tell when the password was last set.  This attribute will be set to whenever the account was created if the password was never reset.  There were 76,157 total users in the "Unity Computers" OU of the Unity domain.

I am certain that the accounts with a pwdLastSet date of 5/17/2006 were random and the passwords have not been reset since the accounts were generated because all of the resets occurred between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM, the time the accounts were all recreated:

------------------------------------------------
Password resets on 5/17/2006 by hour:

Hour: 11:00 (Total: 1714)
Hour: 12:00 (Total: 10423)
Hour: 13:00 (Total: 8097)

Total users found by hour: 20234
------------------------------------------------
20,234 of these users had pwdLastSet dates of 5/16/2006.  This means that their passwords were random.  Of these users, the ratio of disabled to enabled is approximately 2:1.

------------------------------------------------
Password resets on 5/17/2006 by account status:

Enabled users reset on 5/17/2006:  6599
Disabled users reset on 5/17/2006: 13635
Total users reset on 5/17/2006:    20234
------------------------------------------------

Total users found:    76157
Total users to reset: 20234
------------------------------------------------
The 20,234 users whose password was last reset on 5/17/2006 have had their passwords reset to the default Unity combination.</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recreated all of the Unity AD accounts on 5/17/2006.  The accounts were given random passwords when they were created.  The accounts created on this date which have not used the reset password web page have had their passwords reset to the default Unity password combination this morning.</p>

<p>Any user who has used the password reset web page after 5/17/2006 has a synchronized AD password.</p>

<p>Any user account generated after 5/17/2006 has a synchronized AD password becuase the default Unity password combination is used when the accounts are generated.</p>

<p>This means that all Unity AD passwords should be known to the user.  The password will either be determined by the user via the password reset web page or will be the default Unity combination.</p>

<p>Here are some statistics:</p>

<p>By looking at the pwdLastSet attribute on AD user entries, you can tell when the password was last set.  This attribute will be set to whenever the account was created if the password was never reset.  There were 76,157 total users in the "Unity Computers" OU of the Unity domain.</p>

<p>I am certain that the accounts with a pwdLastSet date of 5/17/2006 were random and the passwords have not been reset since the accounts were generated because all of the resets occurred between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM, the time the accounts were all recreated:</p>

<blockquote><p>------------------------------------------------<br />
Password resets on 5/17/2006 by hour:</p>

<p>Hour: 11:00 (Total: 1714)<br />
Hour: 12:00 (Total: 10423)<br />
Hour: 13:00 (Total: 8097)</p>

<p>Total users found by hour: 20234<br />
------------------------------------------------</p></blockquote>
<p>20,234 of these users had pwdLastSet dates of 5/16/2006.  This means that their passwords were random.  Of these users, the ratio of disabled to enabled is approximately 2:1.</p>

<blockquote><p>------------------------------------------------<br />
Password resets on 5/17/2006 by account status:</p>

<p>Enabled users reset on 5/17/2006:  6599<br />
Disabled users reset on 5/17/2006: 13635<br />
Total users reset on 5/17/2006:    20234<br />
------------------------------------------------</p>

<p>Total users found:    76157<br />
Total users to reset: 20234<br />
------------------------------------------------</p></blockquote>
<p>The 20,234 users whose password was last reset on 5/17/2006 have had their passwords reset to the default Unity combination.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=584&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>UNC Path Filter causes BSOD</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=unc_path_filter_causes_bsod&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Miscellaneous</category>
<category domain="alt">Legacy-NDS</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">580@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>The "UNC Path Filter" setting under "Novell Client Configuration" --> "Advanced Settings" can cause your machine to BSOD if set to "On" and you manipulate files and directories via DFS.

Novell's description of the "UNC Path Filter" setting:
Enables/disables the UNC Path Filter. Filters requests for UNC path resolution sent to the Client for Microsoft Networks (Microsoft Redirector). When enabled, UNC path queries sent to the Microsoft Redirector will first be filtered by the Novell Client to see if the server name is known by the Novell Client. If it is known, then a name resolve will not be attempted by the Microsoft Redirector. If the server name is not known, then the usual name resolution process will occur. This can dramatically increase the speed of network file operations and resource mappings.

This has happened to me on 2 different machines.  Here's the configuration:

-Machine is a member of the UNITY domain.
-Novell Client is installed.  The problem happened with both 4.91 SP3 and 4.01 SP4.
-UNC Path Filter is set to On.
-Drive is mapped to a DFS path.

Create a directory somewhere in DFS.  Rename it.  BSOD probably occurs.

The BSOD doesn't occur when using the same configuration but mapping to the underlying share path instead of to DFS.</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "UNC Path Filter" setting under "Novell Client Configuration" --> "Advanced Settings" can cause your machine to BSOD if set to "On" and you manipulate files and directories via DFS.</p>

<p>Novell's description of the "UNC Path Filter" setting:</p>
<blockquote><p>Enables/disables the UNC Path Filter. Filters requests for UNC path resolution sent to the Client for Microsoft Networks (Microsoft Redirector). When enabled, UNC path queries sent to the Microsoft Redirector will first be filtered by the Novell Client to see if the server name is known by the Novell Client. If it is known, then a name resolve will not be attempted by the Microsoft Redirector. If the server name is not known, then the usual name resolution process will occur. This can dramatically increase the speed of network file operations and resource mappings.</p></blockquote>

<p>This has happened to me on 2 different machines.  Here's the configuration:</p>

<p>-Machine is a member of the UNITY domain.<br />
-Novell Client is installed.  The problem happened with both 4.91 SP3 and 4.01 SP4.<br />
-UNC Path Filter is set to On.<br />
-Drive is mapped to a DFS path.</p>

<p>Create a directory somewhere in DFS.  Rename it.  BSOD probably occurs.</p>

<p>The BSOD doesn't occur when using the same configuration but mapping to the underlying share path instead of to DFS.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=580&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Moving scripts to the SAN</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=moving_scripts_to_the_san&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Change Management</category>
<category domain="alt">SCRIPTS00</category>
<category domain="alt">Applications</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">577@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>Here's some change management info:

I've granted the following rights to P:\Scripts and P:\Logs on scripts00, so that we can move off of the local D: drive:

itd.scripter: full control
itd_microsys_staff:  full control
itd_microsys_unity_accounts: full control

I've moved the following scheduled jobs to refer to P: rather than D: (damn whoever decided that environment variables can't be used in scheduled tasks!)

AD Sync Report
Generate Web Pages
Generate_GPO_Settings_Report
GPO Report
GroupSync Remedy
oncallremind
Status-KMS

I have not changed the SCRIPTS_ROOT and LOG_ROOT environment variables, so as not to disrupt Andy unexpectedly.  Scripts will continue to use the D: drive until these are directed to P:


</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's some change management info:</p>

<p>I've granted the following rights to P:\Scripts and P:\Logs on scripts00, so that we can move off of the local D: drive:</p>

<p>itd.scripter: full control<br />
itd_microsys_staff:  full control<br />
itd_microsys_unity_accounts: full control</p>

<p>I've moved the following scheduled jobs to refer to P: rather than D: (damn whoever decided that environment variables can't be used in scheduled tasks!)</p>

<p>AD Sync Report<br />
Generate Web Pages<br />
Generate_GPO_Settings_Report<br />
GPO Report<br />
GroupSync Remedy<br />
oncallremind<br />
Status-KMS</p>

<p>I <b>have not</b> changed the <kbd>SCRIPTS_ROOT</kbd> and <kbd>LOG_ROOT</kbd> environment variables, so as not to disrupt Andy unexpectedly.  Scripts will continue to use the D: drive until these are directed to P:</p>


]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=577&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Domain member getting C32 installed notes</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=domain_member_getting_c32_installed_note&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Workstation Deployment</category>
<category domain="alt">Miscellaneous</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">574@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>I'm trying to find out if Client-32 can interoperate with AD under _any_ conditions.

I've installed a clean windows machine on a VM, joined it to the domain, and then installed Client-32 v4.91SP4 plus the "491psp4_lgncxw32" patch to fix "contextless login prolems with Citrix"  Under "advanced properties" I've unchecked "Initial Novell Login" so nwgina doesn't nuke msgina.dll.

Contextless login with LDAP is all configured.

Whrn "Login Without Novell's GINA" was "On" I didn't get either a dialog or a login when I authenticated as a domain user.  I set it to "Off"
 and still got no Novell login.

Tomorrow I'll try installing the optional "Identity Manager" C32 bits, and see if that helps.

</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to find out if Client-32 can interoperate with AD under _any_ conditions.</p>

<p>I've installed a clean windows machine on a VM, joined it to the domain, and then installed Client-32 v4.91SP4 plus the "491psp4_lgncxw32" patch to fix "contextless login prolems with Citrix"  Under "advanced properties" I've unchecked "Initial Novell Login" so nwgina doesn't nuke msgina.dll.</p>

<p>Contextless login with LDAP is all configured.</p>

<p>Whrn "Login Without Novell's GINA" was "On" I didn't get either a dialog or a login when I authenticated as a domain user.  I set it to "Off"<br />
 and still got no Novell login.</p>

<p>Tomorrow I'll try installing the optional "Identity Manager" C32 bits, and see if that helps.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=574&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Adding profiles and home dirs</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=adding_profiles_and_home_dirs&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Applications</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">568@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>Adding a file system

Issue: After creating user accounts, what are the consequences of using them but adding home directories and roaming profiles later?

Recommended course of action: 
Wait for implementation of roaming profiles before having users log in. Ideally, wait for home directories as well.

Optional Plan: 
For departments that plan to opt out of roaming profiles, have them configure loopback. Home directory space will come later but will be non-disruptive. 

Departments that plan to use roaming profiles should wait. Adding roaming profiles to an existing user will cause a headache. While the user's existing profile would not be destroyed. The new domain profile would not have the user's data. The data would have to be copied by someone with rights to both the existing profile and the user's new roaming profile on the network.
</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding a file system</p>

<p>Issue: After creating user accounts, what are the consequences of using them but adding home directories and roaming profiles later?</p>

<p>Recommended course of action: <br />
Wait for implementation of roaming profiles before having users log in. Ideally, wait for home directories as well.</p>

<p>Optional Plan: <br />
For departments that plan to opt out of roaming profiles, have them configure loopback. Home directory space will come later but will be non-disruptive. </p>

<p>Departments that plan to use roaming profiles should wait. Adding roaming profiles to an existing user will cause a headache. While the user's existing profile would not be destroyed. The new domain profile would not have the user's data. The data would have to be copied by someone with rights to both the existing profile and the user's new roaming profile on the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=568&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Default security/role groups for new org containers</title>
					<link>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?title=default_security_role_groups_for_new_org&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Applications</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">562@http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/</guid>
					<description>Folks,

I had a chat with Barry on Friday regarding the types of tasks typically performed by his administrators, and we have a (short) list of default roles I plan to document and someday codify.

We were basically trying to ease adminstrator of three types of resources - containers, file systems, and printers.

In a new delegated OU, we would create a series of groups, and assign rights to those groups.  The plan is to make it as easy as possible for folks to do routine tasks.  The option to arbitrarily complex rights assignment is still available in MMC.

== Group OU_Supervisors
Membership would intially be the "Manager" associated with the organization's remedy group. 

Members of this group would have the rights needed to add or remove members from any of the role/security groups.  The Remedy Manager would be responsible for identifying who in their organization should control access, and place them in this group.

== Group OU_Full_Control
Membership would initially be null.

Members of this group would have full control, including create and delete object rights of the organization's AD container.

The Remedy Manager would populate this.  Barry confirms that most folks who would manage AD would manage everything, but not likely delegate.

== Group GPO_Full_Control
Membership would initially be null.

Membershers of this group would have rights to create, modify, and assign Group Policy Objects.  Since GPOs aren't stored in a shared container for the whole domain, it was desirable to have this seperate from GPO_Full_Control.  Mistakes made with accounts in this group could potentially impact the entire campus.

The Remedy Manager would populate this.

== Group LockerName_Full_Control
== Group LockerName_ReadOnly
== Group LockerName_ReadWrite

Membership for all three groups would initially be null, and the Remedy Manager would populate them.

These groups would control basic access to a filesystem or "locker"  Members of "ReadWrite" would have modify, read, write and create style access.  The Full_Control group could also assign rights and take ownership.  By default, no read access at all is set for new lockers.  For "public" lockers, like App space, the "ReadOnly" group would need to include "Everybody"

== Group Printer_Operators

Membership would initially be null, and the Remedy Manager would populate this group.

Members can start and stop printers, see and hold the job queue, and basically control printers in the OU.

== Group Printer_Creators
With changes coming to the WolfPrint system, it may be possible to delegate the creation of new accounted printing printers directly.  This group would control access if this proves viable.

</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks,</p>

<p>I had a chat with Barry on Friday regarding the types of tasks typically performed by his administrators, and we have a (short) list of default roles I plan to document and someday codify.</p>

<p>We were basically trying to ease adminstrator of three types of resources - containers, file systems, and printers.</p>

<p>In a new delegated OU, we would create a series of groups, and assign rights to those groups.  The plan is to make it as easy as possible for folks to do routine tasks.  The option to arbitrarily complex rights assignment is still available in MMC.</p>

<p>== Group OU_Supervisors<br />
Membership would intially be the "Manager" associated with the organization's remedy group. </p>

<p>Members of this group would have the rights needed to add or remove members from any of the role/security groups.  The Remedy Manager would be responsible for identifying who in their organization should control access, and place them in this group.</p>

<p>== Group OU_Full_Control<br />
Membership would initially be null.</p>

<p>Members of this group would have full control, including create and delete object rights of the organization's AD container.</p>

<p>The Remedy Manager would populate this.  Barry confirms that most folks who would manage AD would manage everything, but not likely delegate.</p>

<p>== Group GPO_Full_Control<br />
Membership would initially be null.</p>

<p>Membershers of this group would have rights to create, modify, and assign Group Policy Objects.  Since GPOs aren't stored in a shared container for the whole domain, it was desirable to have this seperate from GPO_Full_Control.  Mistakes made with accounts in this group could potentially impact the entire campus.</p>

<p>The Remedy Manager would populate this.</p>

<p>== Group LockerName_Full_Control<br />
== Group LockerName_ReadOnly<br />
== Group LockerName_ReadWrite</p>

<p>Membership for all three groups would initially be null, and the Remedy Manager would populate them.</p>

<p>These groups would control basic access to a filesystem or "locker"  Members of "ReadWrite" would have modify, read, write and create style access.  The Full_Control group could also assign rights and take ownership.  By default, no read access at all is set for new lockers.  For "public" lockers, like App space, the "ReadOnly" group would need to include "Everybody"</p>

<p>== Group Printer_Operators</p>

<p>Membership would initially be null, and the Remedy Manager would populate this group.</p>

<p>Members can start and stop printers, see and hold the job queue, and basically control printers in the OU.</p>

<p>== Group Printer_Creators<br />
With changes coming to the WolfPrint system, it may be possible to delegate the creation of new accounted printing printers directly.  This group would control access if this proves viable.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://microsys.unity.ncsu.edu/blog/index.php?p=562&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
					</channel>
</rss>
